Swarm Coder: AI Governance Through Geometry
One-liner: The navigation system for AI agents—the same math that coordinates drone swarms now coordinates coding agents, preventing drift into bugs, hallucinations, or policy violations.
The Problem
AI agents are blind. They can’t see:
- The full codebase
- What other agents are doing
- When they’re drifting from intended behavior
Just like a drone without a camera needs sonar, GPS, and swarm awareness to avoid crashing—AI coding agents need governance, consensus, and spatial awareness to avoid errors.
The Solution: 6 Agents, 1 Geometry
┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ SWARM CODER │
│ "6 AI agents that code like a drone swarm" │
├────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │
│ ┌─────┐ ┌─────┐ ┌─────┐ │
│ │ KO │ │ AV │ │ RU │ ← Orchestrate │
│ │Flow │ │I/O │ │Policy│ Design/Code │
│ └──┬──┘ └──┬──┘ └──┬──┘ │
│ │ │ │ │
│ └──────────┼──────────┘ │
│ ▼ │
│ ┌──────────────────┐ │
│ │ Poincaré Ball │ ← Shared behavior │
│ │ (Hyperbolic │ space where │
│ │ geometry) │ position = intent │
│ └──────────────────┘ │
│ ▲ │
│ ┌──────────┼──────────┐ │
│ │ │ │ │
│ ┌──┴──┐ ┌──┴──┐ ┌──┴──┐ │
│ │ CA │ │ UM │ │ DR │ ← Verify │
│ │Comp │ │Sec │ │Auth │ Test/Review │
│ └─────┘ └─────┘ └─────┘ │
│ │
└────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
How It Works
1. Decimal Drift Detection
Every agent’s actions are tracked as a position in hyperbolic space. When an agent drifts from expected behavior:
Agent behavior: (0.2, 0.5, 0.1) → (0.4, 0.6, 0.3) → (0.7, 0.8, 0.5)
Policy anchor: (0.2, 0.5, 0.1)
Distance grows: 0 → 0.2 → 0.6
System response:
├── 0.0-0.3: Interior → Normal operation
├── 0.3-0.6: Border → Increased scrutiny
└── 0.6+: Exterior → Require approval / DENY
2. Harmonic Wall Cost
The further you drift, the exponentially harder it gets:
H(d) = exp(d²)
d = 0.0 → H = 1.00 (free to operate)
d = 0.5 → H = 1.28 (slight friction)
d = 1.0 → H = 2.72 (noticeable cost)
d = 2.0 → H = 54.6 (expensive)
d = 3.0 → H = 8,103 (effectively blocked)
Adversarial actions cost exponentially more. No rules needed—the geometry enforces safety.
3. Byzantine Fault Tolerant Consensus
4-of-6 agents must agree. One rogue agent can’t corrupt the swarm:
Quorum: 2f + 1 = 5 (tolerates 2 failures)
Weighted by Sacred Tongue (φⁿ golden ratio)
KO votes: weight 1.00
AV votes: weight 1.62
RU votes: weight 2.62
CA votes: weight 4.24
UM votes: weight 6.85
DR votes: weight 11.09
Why This Matters
| Physical Drone | AI Coding Agent |
|---|---|
| Position in 3D space | Position in behavior space |
| Physical drift | Decimal drift (policy deviation) |
| Gravity/sonar failsafe | Governance/consensus failsafe |
| Frequency navigation | Sacred Tongue protocols |
| Blind without camera | Blind without full context |
| Swarm awareness | Multi-agent consensus |
Same math. Same coordination. Different domain.
Technical Specs
- 14-layer decision pipeline from input to ALLOW/DENY
- Post-quantum safe: ML-KEM (Kyber) + ML-DSA (Dilithium)
- Hyperbolic geometry: Poincaré ball model (curvature = -1)
- SS1 Tokenizer: Phonetic encoding for semantic security
- Dual-lattice: Combines semantic + computational security
Use Cases
1. AI Coding Swarm
6 agents collaborate on code. Each specializes:
- KO: Orchestration, task flow
- AV: Input/output, API calls
- RU: Policy enforcement, rules
- CA: Core computation, encryption
- UM: Security scanning, redaction
- DR: Authentication, schema validation
2. Space Debris Removal
Spacecraft swarm that:
- Operates autonomously (no ground control delay)
- Survives if one satellite fails (BFT)
- Can’t be hijacked (PQC encryption)
- Coordinates without central command
3. Enterprise AI Governance
Every AI action passes through governance:
POST /govern
{
"actor": { "id": "gpt-agent", "type": "ai" },
"resource": { "type": "contract", "value_usd": 50000 },
"intent": "auto_approve"
}
Response:
{
"decision": "ESCALATE",
"rationale": "Contract value exceeds auto-approval threshold",
"required_approvers": ["legal-team"]
}
The Stack
| Layer | Component | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| L1-4 | Context Processing | Normalize & embed inputs |
| L5 | Hyperbolic Metric | Distance-preserving geometry |
| L6-7 | Breathing Transform | Phase-shifted Möbius operations |
| L8 | Trust Realms | Multi-well decision spaces |
| L9-10 | Spectral Coherence | Polyhedral stability checks |
| L11 | Temporal Distance | Time-aware decisions |
| L12 | Harmonic Wall | Exponential adversarial cost |
| L13 | Decision Gate | ALLOW / DENY / ESCALATE |
| L14 | Audio Axis | Telemetry & monitoring |
Status
- Patent: Application filed (provisional)
- Code: 995+ tests passing
- Security: Post-quantum cryptography integrated
- Deployment: Kubernetes manifests ready
Contact
GitHub: SCBE-AETHERMOORE
“We don’t write rules. We write geometry. The math itself prevents adversarial drift.”