SCBE-AETHERMOORE Audit Response Action Plan
Date: January 20, 2026 Source: USPTO Simulation, Code Review, Mathematical Proofs Audit Status: Action Required Priority: Critical
Executive Summary
The comprehensive audit identified that while the mathematical foundations are valid, several issues require immediate attention:
- Patent Claims: Physics metaphors triggering § 101 (Abstract Idea) and § 112 (Enablement) rejections
- Architecture: Single points of failure and scalability limitations
- Security: CI/CD gaps and secrets management
- Documentation: “Intent detection” claims need scientific grounding
1. Patent Strategy: De-Metaphysicize Claims
1.1 Rename “Time Dilation” → “Asymptotic Latency Throttling”
Problem: Claim 54’s “Acoustic Black Hole” with infinite time dilation (γ → ∞) is physically impossible for software.
Action: Rewrite as rate-limiting mechanism.
| Before | After |
|---|---|
| “Acoustic Black Hole creates infinite time dilation” | “Asymptotic Latency Throttling where query latency L(n) scales super-exponentially” |
| γ → ∞ (physics metaphor) | L(n) = O(1.5^(d²)) where d = attack density |
Implementation:
# OLD: Time dilation metaphor
def acoustic_black_hole(query):
gamma = float('inf') # Physically impossible
return dilate_time(query, gamma)
# NEW: Asymptotic Latency Throttling
def asymptotic_latency_throttle(query, attack_density: float) -> float:
"""
Rate-limiting where latency scales super-exponentially with attack density.
L(d) = base_latency * 1.5^(d^2)
"""
base_latency = 0.001 # 1ms
return base_latency * (1.5 ** (attack_density ** 2))
File to Update: src/harmonic/scaling.py, PATENT_STRATEGY_ACTION_ITEMS.md
1.2 Delete/Redefine “Entropy Export” → “Signal Attenuation”
Problem: Claim 57’s entropy export to “null-space” violates thermodynamics (Second Law).
Action: Redefine as noise injection for SNR maintenance.
| Before | After |
|---|---|
| “Export entropy to null-space to bypass Second Law” | “Signal Attenuation via noise injection in unused spectrum channels” |
| Thermodynamic violation | Standard signal processing |
Implementation:
# OLD: Entropy export (pseudoscience)
def export_entropy_to_null_space(signal):
return violate_thermodynamics(signal) # Impossible
# NEW: Signal Attenuation (valid engineering)
def signal_attenuation(active_channels: list, noise_floor: float) -> dict:
"""
Inject calibrated noise into unused spectrum channels
to maintain SNR in active channels.
"""
unused = get_unused_channels(active_channels)
for channel in unused:
inject_noise(channel, noise_floor)
return {"attenuated": len(unused), "snr_maintained": True}
File to Update: Patent claims document, technical specifications
1.3 Human Microgeneration Patent Status
Previous Decision: Removed from patent strategy (prior art: kinetic energy harvesting at gyms)
Audit Note: On-sale bar concern if pilots are active.
Current Status: ✅ Already removed from PATENT_STRATEGY_ACTION_ITEMS.md - correct decision. No further action needed.
2. Mathematical & Physics Refinement
2.1 Reframe “Intent Detection” → “Signal Complexity Analysis”
Problem: Claiming to detect psychological “intent” via jitter/shimmer is:
- Scientifically weak
- Vulnerable to deepfakes
- Not patentable under § 101
Action: Rebrand as liveness detection distinguishing signal types.
| Before | After |
|---|---|
| “Detect malicious intent via Symphonic Cipher” | “Signal Complexity Verification distinguishing synthetic vs organic signals” |
| Psychological claim | Information-theoretic claim |
Technical Basis:
def signal_complexity_analysis(signal: np.ndarray) -> dict:
"""
Distinguish deterministic synthetic signals (low entropy)
from stochastic organic signals (high entropy).
NOT claiming to detect psychological intent.
Claiming to measure signal complexity/entropy.
"""
entropy = spectral_entropy(signal)
complexity = kolmogorov_complexity_estimate(signal)
return {
"classification": "organic" if entropy > THRESHOLD else "synthetic",
"entropy": entropy,
"complexity": complexity,
"confidence": calculate_confidence(entropy, complexity)
}
Files to Update:
src/symphonic/cipher.ts- Update commentsdocs/- Rename “Intent Detection” references- Patent claims - Reframe language
2.2 Clarify Planetary Seeding Constants
Problem: Seeding RNGs with planetary frequencies provides no cryptographic advantage over arbitrary constants.
Action: Keep for branding, redefine technically as “Deterministic External Seed Sources.”
| Before | After |
|---|---|
| “Planetary frequencies provide cosmic alignment” | “Deterministic External Seed Sources for reproducible initialization” |
| Mystical branding | Technical specification |
Implementation:
# Planetary constants (kept for branding consistency)
PLANETARY_SEEDS = {
"mercury": 0.240846, # Orbital period ratio
"venus": 0.615198,
"earth": 1.0,
"mars": 1.88082,
# ... etc
}
# Technical specification (for patent/compliance)
"""
Deterministic External Seed Sources:
These constants are arbitrary but fixed values used for
reproducible PRNG initialization across distributed systems.
No cryptographic advantage is claimed over other constants.
Selected for aesthetic/branding consistency only.
"""
3. Software Architecture Fixes
3.1 Remove continue-on-error: true from Security Scans
Problem: CI/CD passes builds despite critical vulnerabilities - security theater.
Action: Block builds on security failures.
File: .github/workflows/*.yml
# BEFORE (insecure)
- name: Security Scan
run: npm audit
continue-on-error: true # BAD: Allows vulnerable builds
# AFTER (secure)
- name: Security Scan
run: npm audit --audit-level=critical
continue-on-error: false # GOOD: Blocks vulnerable builds
Priority: HIGH - This is a critical security gap.
3.2 Replace ProtonMail Bridge with Message Queue
Problem: Local email bridge is:
- Single point of failure
- Not horizontally scalable
- Bottleneck for agent orchestration
Action: Migrate to Redis/BullMQ or Kafka.
Current Architecture:
ProtonMail Bridge → Mail/Coordinator → Agents
↑
(SPOF)
Target Architecture:
Ingest (any) → Redis/BullMQ → Agent Workers (N)
↓
Horizontal Scaling
Implementation Options:
| Option | Pros | Cons |
|---|---|---|
| Redis + BullMQ | Simple, fast, good for <1M msgs/day | Single-node limit |
| Kafka | Unlimited scale, replay | Complex ops |
| AWS SQS | Managed, cheap | AWS lock-in |
Recommendation: Start with Redis + BullMQ (already considering per audit). Migrate to Kafka if volume exceeds 1M msgs/day.
3.3 Replace Notion with Dedicated Workflow Engine
Problem: Notion API limits (3 req/sec) unsuitable for mission-critical workflows.
Action: Use Temporal or Airflow for state management.
Current:
Agents → Notion API (3 req/sec limit) → State
Target:
Agents → Temporal/Airflow → State
↓
Notion (reporting only)
Recommendation: Temporal for:
- Durable execution
- Automatic retries
- Workflow versioning
- Native TypeScript SDK
4. Security Hardening
4.1 Implement Adaptive Dwell Duration (Security Gate)
Concept: Waiting room with exponentially increasing delays.
Implementation:
class SecurityGate:
"""
Adaptive Dwell Duration for brute-force mitigation.
CRITICAL: Calculate dwell time BEFORE heavy crypto
to prevent resource exhaustion (DoS).
"""
def __init__(self, base_dwell: float = 1.0):
self.base_dwell = base_dwell
self.attempt_counts = {} # IP -> count
def calculate_dwell(self, client_id: str) -> float:
"""
τ_next = τ_current × 2 (exponential backoff)
"""
attempts = self.attempt_counts.get(client_id, 0)
return self.base_dwell * (2 ** attempts)
async def process_request(self, request):
# 1. Calculate dwell FIRST (cheap)
dwell = self.calculate_dwell(request.client_id)
# 2. Apply dwell (rate limiting)
await asyncio.sleep(dwell)
# 3. THEN do expensive crypto (only after dwell)
result = await self.decrypt_and_verify(request)
# 4. Update attempt count
if not result.success:
self.attempt_counts[request.client_id] = \
self.attempt_counts.get(request.client_id, 0) + 1
else:
self.attempt_counts[request.client_id] = 0
return result
Priority: HIGH - Prevents DoS via resource exhaustion.
4.2 Centralize Secrets Management
Problem: Secrets in environment variables lack:
- Rotation policies
- Audit trails
- Access controls
Action: Migrate to centralized secrets manager.
Options:
| Solution | Best For | Cost |
|---|---|---|
| HashiCorp Vault | Multi-cloud, on-prem | Self-hosted or \(\) |
| AWS Secrets Manager | AWS-native | $0.40/secret/month |
| 1Password Connect | Small teams | $7.99/user/month |
Recommendation: AWS Secrets Manager (already on AWS Lambda).
Implementation:
# BEFORE: Environment variables
import os
pqc_key = os.environ['PQC_PRIVATE_KEY'] # Static, no rotation
# AFTER: AWS Secrets Manager
import boto3
from botocore.exceptions import ClientError
def get_secret(secret_name: str) -> str:
"""Retrieve secret with automatic rotation support."""
client = boto3.client('secretsmanager')
response = client.get_secret_value(SecretId=secret_name)
return response['SecretString']
pqc_key = get_secret('scbe/pqc/private-key') # Rotatable, audited
Rotation Policy:
- PQC keys: 90 days
- API tokens: 30 days
- Database credentials: 7 days
5. Documentation Updates
5.1 Symphonic Cipher Refactor
Files to Update:
src/symphonic/cipher.tsdocs/FULL_SYSTEM_ENABLEMENT.md.kiro/specs/symphonic-cipher/
Changes: | Find | Replace | |——|———| | “Intent Detection” | “Signal Complexity Verification” | | “Detect malicious intent” | “Classify signal origin (synthetic/organic)” | | “Psychological analysis” | “Entropy-based classification” |
Action Item Summary
| # | Action | Priority | Owner | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rename Time Dilation → Asymptotic Latency Throttling | Critical | Patent | TODO |
| 2 | Delete/Redefine Entropy Export → Signal Attenuation | Critical | Patent | TODO |
| 3 | Reframe Intent Detection → Signal Complexity Analysis | High | Docs | TODO |
| 4 | Clarify Planetary Seeding as arbitrary constants | Medium | Docs | TODO |
| 5 | Remove continue-on-error: true from CI/CD | Critical | DevOps | TODO |
| 6 | Plan Redis/BullMQ migration | High | Arch | TODO |
| 7 | Evaluate Temporal for workflow | Medium | Arch | TODO |
| 8 | Implement Adaptive Dwell Duration | High | Security | TODO |
| 9 | Migrate to AWS Secrets Manager | High | Security | TODO |
| 10 | Update Symphonic Cipher docs | Medium | Docs | TODO |
Timeline Recommendation
Week 1: Items 1, 2, 5 (Critical patent and security fixes) Week 2: Items 3, 4, 10 (Documentation updates) Week 3-4: Items 6, 7, 8, 9 (Architecture improvements)
Appendix: USPTO Rejection Summary
| Claim | Issue | Rejection | Resolution |
|---|---|---|---|
| 54 | Acoustic Black Hole / Time Dilation | § 101, § 112 | Asymptotic Latency Throttling |
| 57 | Entropy Export to Null-Space | § 101, § 112 | Signal Attenuation |
| Intent Claims | Psychological detection | § 101 | Signal Complexity Analysis |
| Planetary Seeds | No crypto advantage | § 112 | Deterministic External Seeds |
This document should be reviewed by patent counsel before filing amendments.