SCBE-AETHERMOORE: Complete Technical Deck
Version: 5.0
Status: Production-Ready
Deck Last Updated: January 17, 2026
Repo Deck Consolidation: February 19, 2026
Data Confidence
- Verified in this repo run:
python six-tongues-cli.py selftestpytest -q tests/test_six_tongues_cli.py tests/test_spiralverse_canonical_registry.py
- Repo-documented benchmark values:
docs/ARCHITECTURE.md
- Reported operational values (deck-provided, external runtime context):
- AWS/Lambda fleet metrics, enterprise throughput, and deployment anecdotes.
Executive Summary
SCBE-AETHERMOORE is a 14-layer post-quantum hyperbolic governance system that combines:
- post-quantum cryptography (ML-KEM-768, ML-DSA-65)
- hyperbolic trust geometry
- fail-to-noise authorization semantics
- multi-agent coordination controls
Core effect: contextual deviation drives superexponential risk amplification:
H(d, R) = R^(d^2), R > 1
This creates hard trust boundaries in geometric space while keeping normal-path overhead low.
Table of Contents
- System Architecture
- Mathematical Foundations
- Minimal Setup Requirements
- Quick Start
- Deployment Patterns
- Configuration Reference
- Production Checklist
- Visual Architecture
- HYDRA Multi-Agent Coordination Integration
- Drone Fleet Integration (SCBE + GeoSeal + Topological CFI)
- FAQ
1. System Architecture
1.1 The 14-Layer Pipeline
Layer flow:
- Layer 1: Complex Context State
- Layer 2: Realification
- Layer 3: Weighted Transform
- Layer 4: Poincare Embedding
- Layer 5: Hyperbolic Distance (immutable law)
- Layer 6: Breathing Transform
- Layer 7: Phase Transform
- Layer 8: Multi-Well Realms
- Layer 9: Spectral Coherence
- Layer 10: Spin Coherence
- Layer 11: Triadic Temporal Distance
- Layer 12: Harmonic Scaling
- Layer 13: Decision and Risk
- Layer 14: Audio Axis (optional multi-modal)
Decision terminal:
ALLOW | DENY | NOISE
1.2 Layer Math Summary
- Layer 1:
z in C^Dpreserves amplitude + phase intent - Layer 2:
C^D -> R^(2D)via(Re, Im)split - Layer 3:
G = diag(g_1, ..., g_n)with golden-ratio-style weighting - Layer 4:
u = tanh(alpha ||x||) * x / ||x|| - Layer 5:
d_H(u,v) = arcosh(1 + 2||u-v||^2 / ((1-||u||^2)(1-||v||^2)))
- Layer 6:
u -> tanh(b * artanh(||u||)) * u / ||u||
- Layer 7: Mobius addition + rotation
- Layer 8:
d*(u) = min_k d_H(u, mu_k) - Layer 9:
S_spec = 1 - HF_energy / total_energy - Layer 10:
C_spin = ||sum_j s_j(t)|| / sum_j ||s_j(t)|| - Layer 11:
d_tri = sqrt(lambda1 d1^2 + lambda2 d2^2 + lambda3 dG^2) - Layer 12:
H(d,R) = R^(d^2) - Layer 13:
Risk' = Risk_base * H(d*, R)
1.3 Architectural Principles
- Immutable law:
- Hyperbolic metric is governance anchor.
- Fail-to-noise:
- Wrong context returns noise-like output, not an oracle-friendly error.
- Diffeomorphic governance:
- Smooth transforms (breathing/phase) avoid singular policy jumps.
- Lipschitz continuity:
- Small context changes imply bounded risk changes.
2. Mathematical Foundations
2.1 Notation
C^D: complex context spaceR^n: Euclidean transformed spaceB^n: Poincare ball{u in R^n : ||u|| < 1}- Euclidean norm:
||x|| = sqrt(x^T x) - Weighted norm:
||x||_G = sqrt(x^T G x)
Hyperbolic functions:
tanh(x) = (e^x - e^-x) / (e^x + e^-x)artanh(x) = 0.5 ln((1+x)/(1-x))sech(x) = 1 / cosh(x)
2.2 Core Theorems (Deck Canon)
- Polar decomposition uniqueness in
C. - Isometric realification
C^D -> R^(2D). - Poincare embedding containment (
||Psi_alpha(x)|| < 1). - Hyperbolic metric axioms for
d_H. - Breathing transform preserves ball constraints.
- Harmonic scaling monotonicity and superexponential profile.
- End-to-end continuity (Lipschitz on compact subsets).
2.3 Security Properties
- PQ resistance:
- ML-KEM-768 and ML-DSA-65 integration points.
- Oracle hardening:
- fail-to-noise output strategy.
- Byzantine tolerance:
- trust-decay and exclusion policies in swarm modes.
3. Minimal Setup Requirements
3.1 Hardware
- Dev: 2 cores, 4 GB RAM minimum.
- Small production: 4 cores, 8 GB RAM.
- High throughput: 8+ cores, 16+ GB RAM.
3.2 Software
- Python 3.11+
requirements.txtin repo root- Optional PQ acceleration backends where available
3.3 Platform Matrix
- Linux/macOS: supported
- Windows: supported (PowerShell and WSL workflows in repo)
- Docker/Kubernetes: supported paths present
- AWS Lambda: deployment artifacts present in repo
4. Quick Start
4.1 Local Install
git clone https://github.com/issdandavis/SCBE-AETHERMOORE.git
cd SCBE-AETHERMOORE
python -m venv .venv
source .venv/bin/activate # Windows: .venv\Scripts\activate
pip install -r requirements.txt
4.2 Validate Install
python six-tongues-cli.py selftest
pytest -q tests/test_six_tongues_cli.py tests/test_spiralverse_canonical_registry.py
4.3 Optional Full Test Sweep
pytest -q tests
5. Deployment Patterns
5.1 Docker
- Use repo Dockerfiles and compose files:
Dockerfiledocker-compose.ymldocker-compose.api.ymldocker-compose.unified.yml
5.2 Kubernetes
- Deploy gate service + HPA pattern.
- Monitor p95 latency and denial spikes.
5.3 Serverless (Lambda)
- Lambda packaging/deployment paths exist under repo deployment structure.
- Recommended for bursty traffic and scale-to-zero economics.
5.4 Edge/Offline
- Precompute and cache critical lookup/state data.
- Sync trust data when online.
6. Configuration Reference
Primary domains:
- system mode and logging
- crypto suite selection
- harmonic scaling parameters
- trust and swarm thresholds
- monitoring and tracing endpoints
Representative keys:
SCBE_MODESCBE_LOG_LEVELSCBE_HARMONIC_R- vault and database credentials
7. Production Checklist
7.1 Security
- no hardcoded secrets
- TLS valid
- key rotation policy active
- fail-to-noise behavior validated
7.2 Validation
- test suite green
- load profile tested
- deny/review thresholds tuned for workload
7.3 Observability
- metrics scraping enabled
- dashboards configured
- alerting for denial spikes and trust degradation
7.4 Operations
- runbook current
- incident paths tested
- rollback strategy documented
8. Visual Architecture
System context:
- External actors -> SCBE Gate -> 14-layer verifier -> decision output
Data flow:
- context extraction -> hyperbolic embedding -> risk amplification -> allow/deny/noise
Trust topology:
- swarm trust graph with exclusion threshold policy
Execution timeline:
- layer-level microsecond budgets with spectral/audio as dominant optional components
9. HYDRA Integration
HYDRA provides terminal-native multi-agent coordination above SCBE:
- Spine: coordinator
- Heads: universal AI interface
- Limbs: execution backends
- Librarian: memory/knowledge
- Ledger: audit persistence
Security overlays:
- byzantine consensus path
- spectral anomaly detection path
- SCBE gate on critical actions
Pilot-copilot browser model:
- two agents can co-pilot one browser backend
- additional agents can be attached for extraction/verification as needed
10. Drone Fleet Integration
Document lineage:
- “Drone Fleet System Improvements: Integration of Swarm Coordination, GeoSeal, and Topological CFI”
Six integrated upgrade themes:
- Gravitational braking for rogue drones
- Sphere-in-cube mission-bound topology enforcement
- Harmonic camouflage with stellar pulse modulation
- Sacred Tongue flight dynamics mapping
- Vacuum-acoustic bottle beam data protection concept
- Dimensional lifting for embedded CFI reliability
Operational intent:
- reduce unauthorized maneuver success
- increase intervention window
- improve covert signaling resilience
- enforce bounded control flow under constrained hardware
11. FAQ
Is it production-ready?
Core components are operational in this repository and deployment artifacts are present. For high-stakes environments, external red-team and formal audits are still recommended.
Is it quantum-safe?
The architecture is built to support NIST PQC-era primitives with governance layers above raw cryptography.
What is fail-to-noise?
Denied/invalid contexts return output patterns designed to avoid giving oracle-style failure signals.
Can it run offline?
Yes. Edge/offline operation is supported with local state and deferred sync patterns.
Can this support multi-agent mission systems?
Yes. HYDRA and swarm architecture paths are designed for multi-agent coordination with governance checks.
Repository References
docs/ARCHITECTURE.mddocs/SCBE_FULL_SYSTEM_LAYER_MAP.mddocs/SPIRALVERSE_CODEX.mddocs/specs/SPIRALVERSE_CANONICAL_LINGUISTIC_CODEX_V1.mddocs/specs/spiralverse_canonical_registry.v1.jsondocs/SIX_TONGUES_CLI.mdsix-tongues-cli.pytests/test_six_tongues_cli.pytests/test_spiralverse_canonical_registry.pydocs/hydra/ARCHITECTURE.md
12. Dual Lattice Cross-Stitch v2
Status: Operational component family in src/crypto with hyperbolic octree and hyperpath modules.
12.1 Scope
This appendix captures the Dual Lattice Cross-Stitch integration surface for:
- hyperbolic lattice point construction
- sparse Poincare-ball octree storage
- A* and bidirectional A* hyperpath traversal
- SCBE layer-gated path authorization
- multi-modal logging hooks (visual, audio, ledger)
12.2 Core Files
src/crypto/dual_lattice.pysrc/crypto/dual_lattice_integration.pysrc/crypto/octree.pysrc/crypto/hyperpath_finder.pysrc/crypto/hyperbolic_viz.pysrc/crypto/signed_lattice_bridge.pysrc/crypto/symphonic_waveform.py
12.3 Integration Points
SCBE layer mapping used by the integration modules:
- Layer 1 (PQC): Kyber and Dilithium level gating
- Layers 2-4: signed context to Poincare projection
- Layer 5: hyperbolic distance metric
- Layer 8/9: realm and path validation logic
- Layer 12: harmonic path-cost amplification
- Layer 14: optional path sonification/audio signature
Data flow:
agent context -> lattice point -> Poincare projection -> octree voxel -> hyperpath -> governance decision
12.4 Visualization Outputs (reported artifact names)
dual_lattice_clusters.pngpoincare_disk_projection.pnghyperpath_octree_*.pnghyperpath_finder_demo_*.png
Multi-angle render set commonly referenced:
30/300/090/030/-60
12.5 End-to-End Workflow (cross-realm example)
- Build light-realm and shadow-realm lattice points.
- Insert projected points into sparse octree.
- Use bidirectional A* for cross-realm hyperpath.
- Apply SCBE governance at each voxel step.
- Emit audit artifacts:
- path render
- optional waveform signature
- ledger event record
12.6 Performance Profile (reported)
- Octree insertion:
O(log N) - Geodesic sampling:
O(S) - A* pathfinding:
O(E log V) - Bidirectional A*: practical
~2x-5xspeedup vs single direction - Sparse storage claims: very high memory reduction when occupancy is low
12.7 Validation Notes
The dual-lattice documents assert:
- hyperbolic metric property conformance
- admissible/consistent A* heuristics
- strong realm-separation behavior in clustering
These are treated here as reported system claims unless separately reproduced in active CI tests for the same modules.
12.8 HYDRA and Polly Pad Usage
Recommended pattern:
- persist lattice vectors and realm metadata into Librarian memory entries
- use hyperbolic metric for memory retrieval where supported
- route path traversal events into HYDRA ledger for replay/audit
Pilot-copilot browser workflows can bind path-planning or verification tasks to distinct heads while sharing the same ledger and governance gates.
12.9 Forward Work
- publish a reproducible benchmark script for hyperpath timings
- add direct pytest coverage for
dual_lattice_integration.pypath-gate behavior - formalize output artifact manifest for visualization runs